ext_12626 ([identity profile] ericaceous.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] gaudior 2009-09-04 02:24 pm (UTC)

I

I'd prefer that any dyad or group of people could get a civil union, that this status only imply household commitment and nothing about sex, and there not be marriages defined by the state at all. I abosolutely hate that the state is involved in intimate relationships, but for bureaucratic purposes, I feel like anyone should be able to be a household member/domestic partner/spouse if they agree to make a commitment to the other members of the household.

but I am sort of a radical about family structure issues. Ironic, since I've been in a monogamous dyad for quite a few years now.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting