I'd prefer that any dyad or group of people could get a civil union, that this status only imply household commitment and nothing about sex, and there not be marriages defined by the state at all. I abosolutely hate that the state is involved in intimate relationships, but for bureaucratic purposes, I feel like anyone should be able to be a household member/domestic partner/spouse if they agree to make a commitment to the other members of the household.
but I am sort of a radical about family structure issues. Ironic, since I've been in a monogamous dyad for quite a few years now.
I
but I am sort of a radical about family structure issues. Ironic, since I've been in a monogamous dyad for quite a few years now.