Crossovers!
An interesting thing about West Wing/Lord of the Rings is that Sam is not the equivalent of Sam. Charlie is the equivalent of Sam.
Here is how I think it goes:
Frodo: Jed Bartlett
Sam: Charlie
Gandalf: Leo
Aragorn: Toby
Boromir: Mandy (remember her?)
Merry: Josh
Pippin: Sam
Legolas: C.J.
Gimli: ...Ainsley Hayes is the closest, but it would actually be "that person (probably female) who comes in on the opposite side of C.J., but with whom she bonds and they get close and they are both awesome." This would be Ainsley if Sorkin were better at writing Republicans, I deeply believe.
Other people:
Faramir: Donna
Mordor: All of America's enemies
Saruman and his people: the Republicans. I'm not sure where White Supremacist groups go.
Denethor: Vice-President Hoynes? The relationships don't work, but it's the right role.
Not sure about Theoden (Lord John Marbury?), Eowyn, and especially Gollum. You'd think that, what with him being my favorite character, I would be able to think of someone for Gollum. In terms of the role he plays in the story, honestly this may be Abby Bartlett. But she's so the-opposite-of-slimy! Hm.
--R
Here is how I think it goes:
Frodo: Jed Bartlett
Sam: Charlie
Gandalf: Leo
Aragorn: Toby
Boromir: Mandy (remember her?)
Merry: Josh
Pippin: Sam
Legolas: C.J.
Gimli: ...Ainsley Hayes is the closest, but it would actually be "that person (probably female) who comes in on the opposite side of C.J., but with whom she bonds and they get close and they are both awesome." This would be Ainsley if Sorkin were better at writing Republicans, I deeply believe.
Other people:
Faramir: Donna
Mordor: All of America's enemies
Saruman and his people: the Republicans. I'm not sure where White Supremacist groups go.
Denethor: Vice-President Hoynes? The relationships don't work, but it's the right role.
Not sure about Theoden (Lord John Marbury?), Eowyn, and especially Gollum. You'd think that, what with him being my favorite character, I would be able to think of someone for Gollum. In terms of the role he plays in the story, honestly this may be Abby Bartlett. But she's so the-opposite-of-slimy! Hm.
--R
no subject
no subject
no subject
What is she as it is?
no subject
no subject
Also, I'm getting cognitive dissonance on Merry = Josh and Pippin = Sam. Reversed seems slightly better... but still not right.
no subject
no subject
no subject
My reasons for the two younger ones is: Pippin is youngest, sometimes with a great deal of youthful enthusiasm. Merry is a little older, a little more level-headed, and has more terrible things happen to him (getting shot by white supremacists=falling under the Black Breath).
no subject
no subject
!!!!
Not. Me.
I would totally read it, tho...
no subject
Theoden is the Democratic Party. Not necessarily the actual voters, but the Party. Gandalf (Leo) awakes them from their slumber and they wish they could be as inspired as Aragorn (Toby). Also:
no subject
no subject
You are awesome. Theoden can totally be the Democratic Party, and I agree about Marbury/Bombadil.
Also, I realize that, only being in the middle of Season Two, there's a lot that characters will do that I haven't yet seen, so maybe the equivalencies will come clear? Joey as Eowyn, then? Or someone I haven't met yet?
no subject
If Joey maps to anything it's ... Galadriel? I dunno.
I have a lame mapping for Gollum, but it only sort of works and I'd need to argue for it and you haven't even met that character yet. Also in order to really nail Gollum you have to get the full arc, so it wouldn't become obvious why until close to the end of the series.
BTW, the series gets dramatically less good after season 3, which is to say it falls to "better than most things on television."
no subject
This is the most disturbing notion I have had brought to my attention since the riff in
no subject
I haven't actually seen Dukes of Hazzard even enough to get the reference-- should I?
no subject
Incorrect. This would be Ainsley if Sorkin were better at writing women.
no subject
Yeah. But he's trying so, so hard...
no subject
no subject
(Also, I know that for half of WW fans it's sacrilege to say anything against Aaron Sorkin, but the writers for seasons 5-7 were just better at writing female characters. They just were. I'd disagree with an earlier comment--the season doesn't get less good after S3. It does, however, become a fundamentally different show. I'm just one of those strange fans who liked the second half just as much as the first.)