I am honestly confused here. What does that have to do with my point?
Let me go back a step. "Some people would be willing to accept the concept of same-sex civil unions but not same-sex marriage." Do you disagree with that statement? It seems kinda obvious to me, but if you disagree, I am willing to hear why.
If you accept the statement as phrased, the next question is, How can you have a valid survey if you deliberately leave out a large swath of people?
Or is your point to invalidate the opinions of people who frame the issue differently than you do by somehow pretending that they don't exist . . .?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-04 04:23 am (UTC)Let me go back a step. "Some people would be willing to accept the concept of same-sex civil unions but not same-sex marriage." Do you disagree with that statement? It seems kinda obvious to me, but if you disagree, I am willing to hear why.
If you accept the statement as phrased, the next question is, How can you have a valid survey if you deliberately leave out a large swath of people?
Or is your point to invalidate the opinions of people who frame the issue differently than you do by somehow pretending that they don't exist . . .?